Coerced Testimony Risks explores the troubling issue of forced confessions and witness statements within the American criminal justice system. It examines how psychological coercion during police interrogation can lead to false confessions, undermining due process and potentially resulting in wrongful convictions. The book reveals that even seemingly voluntary confessions can be unreliable due to sophisticated interrogation techniques and power imbalances.
The book delves into the legal precedents, like Miranda v. Arizona, that shape safeguards against self-incrimination, while also highlighting how "third degree" interrogation methods have evolved into modern psychological manipulation. By analyzing real-world case studies and trial transcripts, the book identifies patterns and warning signs of coerced testimony. It also discusses how implicit biases within the system can exacerbate the risk of obtaining coerced statements, despite existing legal protections.
Ultimately, Coerced Testimony Risks argues for a more comprehensive understanding of the psychological and legal factors that contribute to coercion. It progresses by first defining coercion and its forms, then analyzing case studies and psychological tactics, and finally, assessing legal standards. The book offers policy recommendations aimed at mitigating the risk of coerced testimony and ensuring fairer trials, making it a valuable resource for legal professionals, criminal justice reformers, and anyone concerned about the integrity of the justice system.
