(0)

The Christmas Dispute Revived

e-kirja


A Letter from Connecticut to Elder ELIAS LEE,

Anabaptist Teacher in the Vicinity of Ballston, State of New-York.

Norwalk, November 16th, 1799. SIR,

A CONTROVERSYbetween you and Mr. Rogers the

Episcopal Minister of Ballston, having lately fallen into my hands, wherein you

are pleased to treat the Episcopalians of these States in a very ungentlemanly

manner. I shall at present only advert to your assertions, that no man can

ascertain the precise day of the Nativity of our Lord, and of consequence that

Episcopalians are superstitious and absurd in their observance of the 25th of

December, as the anniversary of Christmas. Hereafter, I shall do myself the

pleasure of addressing you on the other observances and doctrines sacred to

Episcopalians, with which you have taken, in my judgment, very unwarrantable

freedoms.

To a man so conversant with the sacred Scripture, and so replenished

with the plenitude of the Holy Spirit, as you profess to be, the circumstance

of St. Luke's beginning his Gospel with a chronological account of an event

immediately connected with our Saviour's Incarnation, and a virtual repetition

of the same thing by the Holy Angel as the time of the Annunciation, can hardly

be supposed matters of indifference: And yet it is evident that you have either

overlooked or mistaken the meaning of both; for you say it is a matter of

indifference whether the day can be ascertained or not: The which I deny, and

think it a matter of great consequence to Christianity that the day of our

Lord's Nativity should be chronologically ascertained. I will therefore,

present you, and the candid public, a calculation of the precise day of the

Nativity founded upon two data, viz. the Old and New Testament.